Timeline Properties
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Starholder is an alternate timeline | Starholder is an alternate timeline which diverged from our world in 1999. It was created as a stopgap solution to address the centrality of capitalism in human life, as it is viewed by cosmic forces as an untenable economic system with contagion potential. | ||
While our solar system itself is not critical to the orderly operation of the universe, changes to its gravitational and astrophysical operation can have knock on effects for the rest of the Milky Way galaxy. The existence of the Starholder Timeline can then be viewed as a protective measure initiated by the Cosmic Corps of Engineers (CCE) responsible for managing the Milky Way. | While our solar system itself is not critical to the orderly operation of the universe, changes to its gravitational and astrophysical operation can have knock on effects for the rest of the Milky Way galaxy. The existence of the Starholder Timeline can then be viewed as a protective measure initiated by the Cosmic Corps of Engineers (CCE) responsible for managing the Milky Way. |
Revision as of 21:30, 6 January 2023
Starholder is an alternate timeline which diverged from our world in 1999. It was created as a stopgap solution to address the centrality of capitalism in human life, as it is viewed by cosmic forces as an untenable economic system with contagion potential.
While our solar system itself is not critical to the orderly operation of the universe, changes to its gravitational and astrophysical operation can have knock on effects for the rest of the Milky Way galaxy. The existence of the Starholder Timeline can then be viewed as a protective measure initiated by the Cosmic Corps of Engineers (CCE) responsible for managing the Milky Way.
Functionally, the Starholder timeline acts as an overflow buffer. Its central purpose is to divert the increasing levels of techno-anxiety induced by late capitalism from our timeline into the Starholder timeline using a mechanism known as Maxwell's Anxious Demon (MAD). MAD is one part sorting mechanism and one part simulation engine. MAD's simulation capabilities allow it to detect butterfly effects that have the potential to trigger the premature collapse of capitalism. Once identified, those actions are diverted from our world by the sorting mechanism and placed into Starholder where they can play out without any worry about their impact on capitalism or the larger worry for the CCE, the orderly celestial functioning of the solar system.
As a stopgap solution, Starholder is classified as a disposable timeline which can be collapsed upon itself once its primary objective of protecting our timeline from failure has been achieved.
The Founding Fork
The Y2K bug in 1999 was the genesis event for the creation of a divergent timeline. At the time, many computer programs represented four-digit years with only the final two digits, making the year 2000 indistinguishable from 1900. Computer systems' inability to distinguish dates correctly had the potential to bring down worldwide infrastructures for industries ranging from banking to air travel. Until this moment, the CCE has ignored human technology considering it to be mostly harmless. Realizing they humans were simultaneously expanding their technological capabilities and placing less emphasis on risk control, they conducted a standard review of the solar system and found immediate intervention to be necessary.
After several rounds of committee meetings, CCE leadership approved a program of active management of Earth, authorizing the creation of an alternate timeline which granted program managers the ability to transfer destabilizing events which would trigger a premature failure of capitalism into Starholder.
Meanwhile on Earth, as concern about the impacts of this bug grew, a group of public-minded citizens, including the comedian Dan Aykroyd, realized that there was no academic institution devoted to the study of low probability, high impact events which have the possibility to reorient humankind. To address this gap, the Starholder Institute was created. A Mojave Desert research campus staffed with a multidisciplinary team of scientists, philosophers, creators and coders was built that year. Its first mission was to research potential negative outcomes should the Y2K bug not be properly patched across a critical threshold of global computer networks.
Unbeknownst to anyone involved in the project, the Starholder Institute was not created in our timeline. There is significant ambiguity around the founding event, but what is clear is that there is no institute or staff present in the Mojave Desert of our world. It is suggested that Dan Aykroyd himself was the original fork from our timeline to the newly created Starholder Timeline. Supporters of this theory suggest that as soon as the idea to create a socio-paranormal think tank came to Aykroyd, the CCE program was initiated and Maxwell's Anxious Demon split him into two realities. In our reality, the idea was just one fleeting thought of many that day. In the Starholder reality, it became Aykroyd's focus for the year and he followed through on it as the founding force of the institute.
Future Fixed Projections
The arc of the Starholder timeline is gradually coming into focus thanks to a feedback mechanism within the MAD system. In order for MAD to improve its ability to detect impactful butterfly events in our timeline, it simulates the projected history of the Starholder timeline to see what impact objects removed from our world have on this alternate one.
Some anxieties introduced into Starholder are unalterably deterministic of its future. An apt metaphor here is Chekhov's Gun. If a gun is removed from our timeline, then it must be fired in Starholder or else there was no reason for MAD to remove it. Unalterably Deterministic Anxieties (UDAs) are rare but important, because their introduction triggers the same event in subsequent projections no matter what new anxieties get introduced at a later date.
Since Starholder has been operating for 24 years now, enough fixed projected events have come to pass that the system can confirm the occurrence of future ones with a 99.9% probability. For instance, it is accepted as fact that the Second Moon event in Starholder will take place in 2042 and that its introduction will radically diverge events from our timeline and Starholder's to the point that many will refuse to believe they had a shared history up until 1999.
Compounding Accumulation, Acceleration & Divergence (CAAD)
Starholder is an unnatural timeline in which its own improbable events are compounded by being burdened with additional improbable events passed into it from MAD. This phenomenon is known as CAAD which stands for Compounding Accumulation, Acceleration and Divergence. When allowed to operate unchecked for one hundred years, an unnatural timeline like Starholder typically becomes unlivable and destroys itself which is why it is called a disposable timeline.
Consider how weird our world is today. Consider how rapidly events are changing within our world. This was strange enough before you knew that the CCE was actually dampening the effects of this weirdness. Now, realize that our world would be even weirder and spiraling out of control faster had it not been actively managed by the MAD system.
Starholder does not have a MAD system managing it. In fact, Starholder is the dumping ground for everything that is abnormally unhealthy from our world. This means that in 1999 it was in the same unstable state as our world when they forked. It then started getting injected with butterfly effect events that then interacted with its own butterfly effect events to create new realities which spawn their own butterfly effects.
CAAD refers to this phenomenon. It starts with accumulation when anxieties are actively introduced to a system that is itself at its limit. These injected anxieties interact with pre-existing anxieties to create an environment in which additional anxieties grow. When a system becomes a hothouse for anxiety due to accumulation, the pace at which strange events occur accelerates. There's a feedback loop where the acceleration of strangeness generates additional anxiety which then generates additional strange events. This is the compounding portion of CAAD. One bad thing is feeding off another to create even more bad things.
Systems can often pull themselves out of compounding accelerated anxiety loops when they occur naturally, however an additional wrinkle is at play here. MAD is selecting anxiety specific to technology-driven late stage capitalism and injecting that into Starholder. This targeted injection of weirdness is focusing the world into a very narrow lens of winner take all economic competition where winning is driven by disruptive technology. Said another way, Starholder's Timeline can only see one way out which is by going straight through the eye of the storm.
This is what causes divergence. Consider for a minute a historical event which occurred in both timelines, the Black Death or bubonic plague outbreak. Without a drastic crash in population and resulting increase in the demand for workers, everyday people in medieval Europe would not have achieved the higher standard of living which ultimately resulted in the Renaissance and then the Enlightenment. Without the Enlightenment, we would not have had concepts such as personal property rights which formed the basis for capitalism which then created the mess we are in today.
Starholder by virtue of being in a compounded accelerated anxiety loop is being overloaded with extreme injections of capitalism while our timeline is being buffered by having the most destabilizing effects removed. This is will cause it to diverge from a timeline it shared a common history with as recently as 1999.
Divergence trigged by compounded accelerated anxiety is a snowball that picks up speed as it rolls downhill. In 1999, the only difference between Starholder and our timeline was the creation of a research institute founded by Dan Aykroyd. Otherwise, everything was the same as it was. Today, the Starholder timeline has already widely adopted and integrated AR/VR mixed systems. By 2042, it will be facing the presence of an alien exo-planet hovering in orbit behind the moon and threatening to invade Earth. This is the most significant future fixed projection in its timeline, but not the only one. By the end of 2099, the world of Starholder and our world will be unrecognizable to each other.
Physics
The physics governing the Starholder timeline are the same as the original timeline, but the effects of anxiety and accelerationism can create situations that are either hypothetically extreme or appear to be magical based on our current understanding of technology.
Starholder as Hyperobject
The Starholder timeline is a hyperobject, meaning it possesses all of the attributes defined by object-oriented ontology, such as existing in multiple dimensions and outside of linear time. It has the ability to materialize in the original timeline in ways that suggest its existence without providing enough evidence to confirm it.
The development of a game based on the unfolding chronology of the Second Moon event, known as the Starholder game, is believed to be a seeding mechanism for the simulation of that keystone event and a necessary condition for the overall success of the Starholder timeline as a release valve for the original timeline. The Starholder game has manifested itself as a hyperobject, with the only known acknowledgement of its existence being a reference to it as a classic text adventure game from the 1980s and 1990s by OpenAI's ChatGPT. However, it is not clear where OpenAI obtained this information or if it is a confident fiction of the AI.
A Simulation Seeking Its Text
Some theoreticians have postulated that the correct mental model for Starholder is that of a simulation seeking its text. This theory argues that because the Starholder timeline exists in parallel to and is fed by improbable events in our reality, it is not an actual timeline, but merely a simulation.
The past confirming the likelihood of fixed future events coming to pass creates a concept of patchwork future history in Starholder.
Criticism
Critics of this theory call the simulation school of Starholder studies a pedantic repackaging which seeks to normalize and diminish both the event itself, but more importantly, the reason for the event which is the unsustainability of capitalism and the lack of a successor replacement for that economic system.